Section 347 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) pertains to the offense of counterfeiting a property mark. This section is designed to address the unlawful act of imitating or falsifying property marks, which are used to indicate ownership or authenticity of goods.
Key Provisions of Section 347 BNS
- Definition: Section 347 states that any individual who counterfeits a property mark is committing an offense. This includes the unauthorized replication of marks that signify ownership or authenticity.
- Comparison with IPC: Section 347 of the BNS is analogous to a similar provision in the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which also addresses counterfeiting property marks. This alignment indicates a continuity in legal standards regarding property rights and protection against fraud.
- Legal Consequences: The section outlines the penalties associated with counterfeiting, although specific punishments are typically detailed in subsequent provisions of the BNS. Such penalties are intended to deter fraudulent activities that undermine trust in property ownership and commerce.
In summary, Section 347 of the BNS reinforces the legal framework against counterfeiting, ensuring that property marks are protected under Indian law, similar to prior regulations established in the IPC.
How does Section 347 of the BNS compare to the corresponding section in the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 347 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is analogous to Section 482 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which also addresses the offense of counterfeiting a property mark. The key similarities between the two sections are:
- Definition: Both sections define the offense as unlawfully counterfeiting a property mark used for indicating ownership or authenticity of goods.
- Legal Consequences: While the specific punishments are not detailed in the search results, it is implied that both sections outline penalties for the crime of counterfeiting property marks, with the intent of deterring such fraudulent activities.
- Alignment of Laws: The correspondence between Section 347 BNS and Section 482 IPC indicates a continuity in the legal framework regarding property rights protection and prevention of fraud in India.
In summary, Section 347 of the BNS carries forward a similar provision to Section 482 of the IPC, maintaining legal standards against counterfeiting property marks in the updated criminal code.
Adv Ashish Sharma has dedicated his career to helping individuals and businesses navigate the intricate legal landscape with confidence. From providing expert advice on current legal issues to offering clear explanations of legal principles, he strives to empower his audience with knowledge and understanding.
