Section 232 BNS – Section 232 of New Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Section 232 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, addresses the issue of threatening individuals to provide false evidence in legal proceedings. This section is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process by imposing severe penalties on those who attempt to manipulate testimonies through intimidation.

Key Provisions

  1. Threatening Behavior:
    • The section states that any individual who threatens another with injury to their person, reputation, or property, or to someone connected to them, with the intent to compel that person to provide false evidence, is subject to punishment. This can include imprisonment for up to seven years, a fine, or both.
  2. Consequences for False Evidence:
    • If an innocent person is convicted as a result of the false evidence obtained through such threats, the individual who made the threat will face the same punishment as that imposed on the innocent person. This could potentially include severe penalties such as life imprisonment or even the death penalty if applicable.

Example Scenario

For instance, if a person threatens a witness to falsely accuse someone of a crime and this leads to the wrongful conviction of an innocent individual sentenced to ten years in prison, the person who issued the threat would receive a similar sentence.

Purpose and Implications

The enactment of Section 232 serves multiple purposes:

  • Deterrence: It aims to deter individuals from engaging in coercive behaviors that undermine judicial processes.
  • Justice: By holding accountable those who manipulate testimonies, it seeks to protect innocent individuals from wrongful convictions.
  • Integrity of Evidence: It reinforces the importance of truthful testimonies in legal proceedings, ensuring that justice is served based on accurate information.

In summary, Section 232 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is a significant legal provision aimed at preventing threats and coercion related to false testimonies, thereby safeguarding the judicial system’s integrity.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *